Compacts
#1
Posted 10 July 2011 - 08:53 PM
#2
Posted 10 July 2011 - 09:30 PM
#3
Posted 10 July 2011 - 09:39 PM
#4
Posted 10 July 2011 - 09:43 PM
#5
Posted 10 July 2011 - 10:27 PM
#6
Posted 10 July 2011 - 10:44 PM
#7
Posted 10 July 2011 - 10:51 PM
#8
Posted 10 July 2011 - 10:51 PM
Edited by skip, 10 July 2011 - 11:04 PM.
#9
Posted 11 July 2011 - 12:16 AM
#10
Posted 11 July 2011 - 12:29 AM
#11
Posted 11 July 2011 - 03:24 AM
#12
Posted 11 July 2011 - 04:01 AM
The compac class takes enought slack from fans and people posting, running the wrong way on the race track is just not gonna get it. Dont mean to be down on any one but why put the compacs to this kind of fun and games.
Not just the fun and games, but like you said before, the safety issue of it is what concerns me. If a car comes around turn two and into turn one, goes over the berm and through the area where the 4 wheeler and wreckers are parked, the only thing between the car and the fans is chain link. If the brakes fail, throttle sticks, or any other mishap, someone is getting hurt badly. With that said, if the idea of running ANY class backwards is brought to the table, my vote is an absolute NO.
#13
Posted 11 July 2011 - 04:35 AM
Not just the fun and games, but like you said before, the safety issue of it is what concerns me. If a car comes around turn two and into turn one, goes over the berm and through the area where the 4 wheeler and wreckers are parked, the only thing between the car and the fans is chain link. If the brakes fail, throttle sticks, or any other mishap, someone is getting hurt badly. With that said, if the idea of running ANY class backwards is brought to the table, my vote is an absolute NO.
I see your point to ive never been down by turn one i dont know whats down there but your right on that to. My point was if they were going the right way and go down the front stretch and get shoved they can just go off of turn one out into the field.
But if the same thing happens and they are going backwards , they could fly right into where the cars enter the track and take out some one standing there , or hit a car sitting there for the next race.
Just to many safety issues in turns 1 and 4 running backwards and the safety lights.
Edited by skip, 11 July 2011 - 04:38 AM.
#14
Posted 11 July 2011 - 07:58 AM
#15
Posted 11 July 2011 - 04:22 PM
#16
Posted 11 July 2011 - 05:27 PM
#17
Posted 11 July 2011 - 06:17 PM
Dan I think why you got so many comment about not having a heat was the points. Another opportunity was lost in a very close battle. The real problem for me was the top guys were from the front to the rear instead of racing each other they had to race the rest of the pack to race who they needed to race. Hopefully we will not have that problem of such a small count again but who knows. Maybe an invert by points would have been better. You'd think by the people who think these aren't real race cars with real set ups that there would be fifty new cars out there just to show the guys how it's done. lol Me I'm just glade we get to race how ever you decide to do it. Turning left of course. Of course you could talk to the sprint guys about the backwards thing... no not really just jokeing. I'd bet that would light up the board though!Compacts....I've given it much thought over the weekend and have listened to many of your comments. This past weekend we made a decision to only run an a-main if the class has 10 or less cars. I understand that you loose the possibility of earning the extra heat race points so here is something that I propose:
If we get 10 or less we will we will run one heat race with starting order based on pill draw. The based on the order of finishe we will invert draw still but we will draw from numbers 2-4-6-8-10. I feel that this will reduce sandbagging for invert draws since there is still a chance of front row draws plus you could still earn the points for the heats.
Any thoughts from compacts or any other fans? We've had this situation one night in stocks also and it could be used for any class that might have a low car count. It is not final but I am looking for input.
#18
Posted 11 July 2011 - 06:31 PM
#19
Posted 11 July 2011 - 07:56 PM
#20
Posted 11 July 2011 - 07:59 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users