
Safety Gear
#1
Posted 03 February 2012 - 08:36 PM
#2
Posted 03 February 2012 - 09:08 PM
#3
Posted 04 February 2012 - 09:21 AM
#4
Posted 04 February 2012 - 11:33 AM

#5
Posted 04 February 2012 - 03:49 PM
Now to your question...... Don't get suckered by "it cost more, it has to be better". Every company has to pass the same tests to be able to sell their products legally. So find something you like that you are comfortable in.
A lot of it IS better. The manufacturers certify their products themselves. Don't buy ANYTHING proban. This is cotton sprayed with crap. It wears off.
There isn't anything special about shoes, but some companies have tags that get stamped/punched to show when they were purchased so make sure you don't get "new" shoes from 2009.
New is new is new. Unless it's proban that washes off, stuff like shoes and gloves are fine. I've used the same gloves and shoes since 1997 and 1998. They finally fell apart.
A single layer suit offers 4 seconds of direct flame contact before burning and a double layer offers seven seconds of protection. I know that doesn't sound like much but really think about what those three seconds will give you. A double layer suit is thinker/heavier, but I feel its worth the extra protection.
A double layer suit is absolutely worth it, and in my opinion should be mandatory. Not sure where your specs come from, but the timing sounds close to what I remember. However, this is in something like an 1800 degree inferno - you're getting burnt the whole time, the 3-7 seconds are before you have third degree burns. Do NOT skimp out on fire safety!
Absolutely incorrect.Helmets HAVE TO be Snell SA 2010.
Correct, the M rating is motorcycle, SA is a fire retardant liner. I've seen vids of a M helmet burning, it is an inferno and BAD. The number is the year of snell spec it was rated, in 5 year increments. As long as the helmet hasn't been hit, it doesn't just suddenly go bad. Don't confuse the SA rating with production date. My carbon fiber simpson helmet last season was manufactured 2/2011 and carried the SA2005 cert. I just ordered a top of the line helmet which was custom built last month. I wanted the previous style, so it too came in a SA2005 cert. Is it not legal or somehow unsafe? The current rules (which REALLY need updated) state a snell M85 is recommended. That's terrible advice on all fronts. I wouldn't go less than 2000, and make sure the helmet hasn't been used. Wear your helmet, don't "use" your helmet.If you have an M rated helmet (motorcycle) it isn't fire retardant.
I just got one of these deals. Also helps keep dust/debris out of the eyeport, and reduces fogging. I will let you know how it works out on the comfort level...unless you tell me my helmet isn't safe or legal LOL.Some drivers like to have a fresh air pump helmet. Recommended if you are a mouth breather, wear glasses, or are usually hot. Just adds that extra comfort level.
Edited by Dirtracer48, 04 February 2012 - 03:52 PM.
#6
Posted 04 February 2012 - 04:59 PM
#7
Posted 04 February 2012 - 05:36 PM
#8
Posted 04 February 2012 - 07:38 PM
Sorry if my statement referring to helmets "have to" be 2010 led to any confusion. I wasn't implying that was any rule. Tim is right, the ratings get renewed every 5 years so the latest year available is 2010. I was only trying to make note not to buy a new helmet with a 2005 or older date. Some tracks and sanctions do check the dates and only allow you to run with a 10 year window. If that is the case, you lose 5 years on your brand new helmet.
Great to have fun by going racing.
I agree with racer50.
How MUCH is your continued well-being worth?
Please, please don't skimp on the safety equipment!!! (regardless of what division you race in!!!!!)
Edited by injunear, 04 February 2012 - 07:41 PM.
#9
Posted 05 February 2012 - 07:52 PM
#10
Posted 06 February 2012 - 05:45 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users