Sport mods/B-mods
#41
Posted 17 July 2012 - 08:25 PM
If you don't no how much it cost to compete that you still are not making a good argument on whether it makes sense to add another class. Lets say your vast range is correct but you can run up front for $8,000 then how does it make sense to race a new class?
You will not run up front for $8000. You may get lucky and have alot of cars drop out and you finish near the front, but you wont be there consistantly. You have a 0% chance of winning with a $8000 car. Pick any feature winner from the three local area track, Eldora, Limaland, and Waynesfield, and $8000 won't get you in the same zip code as one of those cars. I don't know, because I haven't looked into it, but I would think an $8000 B-mod would be very competative.
#42
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:34 PM
#43
Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:44 PM
You bought Brents car for what, $5000? So you have under $3000 in your motor?It can be done, weekly not luck included. I do
#44
Posted 19 July 2012 - 04:59 AM
#45
Posted 19 July 2012 - 06:52 AM
Edited by SutterMotorSports, 19 July 2012 - 06:57 AM.
#46
Posted 19 July 2012 - 04:04 PM
#47
Posted 20 July 2012 - 03:24 AM
Doesn't really matter to me either way I just don't think it will save anyone anything. Stocks or B mods there will always be enough people to outspend others and eliminate their chances so why change what ya got
A division with a chance to grow.
#48
Posted 21 July 2012 - 08:54 AM
#49
Posted 21 July 2012 - 02:11 PM
#50
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:06 PM
#51
Posted 22 July 2012 - 03:28 AM
like the idea of a b-mod class so make it an all steel motor class. and make a limit on the horse power like 500 or 600 hp.
Hence the stock car motor ruling, the junk intake with a 2 barrel carb is probably one of the very few limiting factors of the stock cars pushing 700-750 horse. I know that theres a few cars running cranks/rotating assemblies that are better than some of the front running sprints (winged and non wing). They really arent the "turds" that people proclaim them to be.
#52
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:52 AM
#53
Posted 22 July 2012 - 05:12 PM
The class is pretty much dead because the 2 door, rear wheel drive with a V8 car, is a thing of the past from Detroit. The cars that are left that are decent, are going for big money...so all that is left are rotten junk that is crusher food. Drag racers, dirt racers, pavement racers, high school kids, and car collectors, have used up what Detroit made.
The class is pretty much dead because of the people spending their way to victory lane. The more rules you put on them (or any class) to try to keep the cost down, just adds to the cost. Why? Because guys just throw money into finding a way to circumvent the rules to make that 'junk intake and 2bbl carb' run like it's a good intake with a 4bbl.
The class is dead because across the entire country there is a huge difference in what a track calls a 'stock car'. Rules from tracks in PA are very different than rules from tracks in IN, and OH tracks can't get on the same page with each other besides 2-3 at a time.
Some people might remember back in the mid 1980's a class called > E-Mods < showed up in this area. Yes, the 'E' stood for ECONOMY (AKA cheap/cheaper) They were supposed to have stock front clips with stock A arms and shocks, and damn near junkyard motors due to the claimer rule on them. It didn't take long before the 'E' was gone because 'we could do this and that to the engines and it would be cheaper than blowing up a junkyard motor', or 'we could do this and that to the chassis and it would be cheaper than using junkyard parts'.......and now look what the Modified class has become.
IMCA rules are different than UMP rules. Here again, not everybody is on the same page....
This B-Mod class will become the same thing before too long.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I've been around racing long enough to know, that a 'B-Mod' isn't going to -fix- anything, based on the past history/actions of racers, and their need for speed.
Edited by Need for Speed, 22 July 2012 - 05:13 PM.
#54
Posted 22 July 2012 - 10:28 PM
#55
Posted 23 July 2012 - 02:29 AM
#56
Posted 23 July 2012 - 06:45 AM
#57
Posted 26 July 2012 - 04:52 AM
#58
Posted 27 July 2012 - 10:52 AM
#59
Posted 27 July 2012 - 02:51 PM
BEATING A DEAD HORSE
I agree, so stfu maybe?
#60
Posted 28 July 2012 - 06:37 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users