
AMP Clarification
#1
Posted 07 July 2013 - 04:35 PM
#2
Posted 07 July 2013 - 04:53 PM
#3
Posted 07 July 2013 - 08:44 PM
#4
Posted 07 July 2013 - 08:46 PM
why pay $500 for 5-10 cars when the street stocks are getting about the same and always have around 15 a week?Just a comment about the purse decrease. If Jeff is truly commited to building this class up, then cutting the pay is NOT the way to go. This discourages racers to continue to build a car for this class if they know they are not going to get the $500 for a win.
Jeff is going to have to eat some money if he wants it to grow and that was the indication at the start of the season.
#5
Posted 07 July 2013 - 09:47 PM
#6
Posted 07 July 2013 - 10:02 PM
pretty much spot on walt....if you build a car for this class you pretty much have no where else to run...funny how this is supposed to be an "affordable entry class" but of course it comes back to pay outs...Will someone fill me in on the AMP "semi-late" class?? From where I sit 100 miles away, it appears to be somewhat of a "bastard" class that allows more modifications than a street stock, but is not quite a "Limited Late Model", maybe something like the so called "Limited Late Model" class at Stateline & Eriez, which doesn't fit in with anything else run at other tracks.
#7
Posted 08 July 2013 - 12:45 AM
Will someone fill me in on the AMP "semi-late" class?? From where I sit 100 miles away, it appears to be somewhat of a "bastard" class that allows more modifications than a street stock, but is not quite a "Limited Late Model", maybe something like the so called "Limited Late Model" class at Stateline & Eriez, which doesn't fit in with anything else run at other tracks.
It is like th s/e llm class in the motor area but are an actual late model chassis and not a 2x3 stock stub class like eriez. I believe they actually outlawed stubs at amp. The idea behind it is great and if they could get other tracks to run it I think it would be great. Its more of a poor mans crate class. A 602 would be legal but not the 604 cuz of the aluminum heads. Also a shock rule as well. Kind of doing something different like Sharon did with the 2 bbl mods. If they stick with it the class will definitely grow. Pretty much cheaper to build than a SS. I was thinking about running my llm there until they said no stubs allowed. I could see the numbers double/ triple by end of next yr.
#8
Posted 08 July 2013 - 01:06 AM
#9
Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:28 AM
Will someone fill me in on the AMP "semi-late" class?? From where I sit 100 miles away, it appears to be somewhat of a "bastard" class that allows more modifications than a street stock, but is not quite a "Limited Late Model", maybe something like the so called "Limited Late Model" class at Stateline & Eriez, which doesn't fit in with anything else run at other tracks.
Walt, this class is exactly what the crate series should have been. Late model cars with low budget engines and shocks. The cam rule is a great way to level the playing field. I really think its the way to go with stock frames getting harder and harder to find. This type of class is where the stock type classes are heading. Hell it's a lot cheaper to build a semi late than a street stock.
Find me on Facebook: Kip Charles - Clearfield, PA
or Twitter @kip1977
#10
Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:33 AM
Edited by rsadiedog, 08 July 2013 - 07:36 AM.
#11
Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:51 AM
#12
Posted 08 July 2013 - 08:19 AM
i think the way to go is the 602 crate engine 3500.00 new and its a strong motor it will last 2 seasons easily if mantained and not over reved their are lots of latemodel chassis out there and used motors . i think ounce the word gets out that the 7up car has a 602 you will see more cars jmoThere are now 11 of these cars that raced at AMP and another one should be there this week or definitely next week. The class will continue to grow as it is; the cam rule really controls what a person will spend on an engine. Aluminum heads are legal, the 604 is not legal because of the roller cam. There were two new winners Saturday night, I beleive at least one is a crate engine; I also believe that once this class is established; other tracks will add them to the card.
#13
Posted 08 July 2013 - 08:41 AM
There are now 11 of these cars that raced at AMP and another one should be there this week or definitely next week. The class will continue to grow as it is; the cam rule really controls what a person will spend on an engine. Aluminum heads are legal, the 604 is not legal because of the roller cam. There were two new winners Saturday night, I beleive at least one is a crate engine; I also believe that once this class is established; other tracks will add them to the card.
I applaud Jeff's commitment to the class and the Fenton's desire to field cars for the class. It takes a lot of physical work, time, and money, to haul cars each week, put tires on them and race them.
I look for this class to keep getting stronger. There could easily be double digits by the end of the season.
And coordinating drivers like mentioned above sounds like a great idea. Get them all there on the same night...
Ramey Womer
womerracing.com
umipeformance.com
#14
Posted 08 July 2013 - 10:11 AM
#15
Posted 08 July 2013 - 01:51 PM
There are now 11 of these cars that raced at AMP and another one should be there this week or definitely next week. The class will continue to grow as it is; the cam rule really controls what a person will spend on an engine. Aluminum heads are legal, the 604 is not legal because of the roller cam. There were two new winners Saturday night, I beleive at least one is a crate engine; I also believe that once this class is established; other tracks will add them to the card.
Ok I knew the 604 was illegal I thought it was because of the heads but I didn't read the rules that closely. Seems like a great idea for a class that would be more affordable than a ss for sure not just money wise but u can find a lot of older late model chassis out there cheap that have nowhere for them to go. Nowhere for late model huys to sell their used chassis. Really hope this class works Itself out. This is what crates were supposed to be! I had the first 602 in the area when crates were started at rw7 and thought it was going to be like this class. Boy was I wrong and look at those cars now!!
#16
Posted 08 July 2013 - 02:08 PM
Ok I knew the 604 was illegal I thought it was because of the heads but I didn't read the rules that closely. Seems like a great idea for a class that would be more affordable than a ss for sure not just money wise but u can find a lot of older late model chassis out there cheap that have nowhere for them to go. Nowhere for late model huys to sell their used chassis. Really hope this class works Itself out. This is what crates were supposed to be! I had the first 602 in the area when crates were started at rw7 and thought it was going to be like this class. Boy was I wrong and look at those cars now!!
#17
Posted 09 July 2013 - 09:42 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users