weluvracin, on Oct 2 2013, 06:53 AM, said:
Again Scruuffy, I invite you to give yourself a swirly and clear your head. I said it was more interesting and not less and your original post did not ask for examples to support our vote on whether we felt the site was more or less interesting. 
I asked if the board was more or less interesting:
scruffy1a, on Sep 27 2013, 09:26 PM, said:
Ask the folks who visit more frequently - is the board more or less interesting this week than last week?
You said it was more interesting:
weluvracin, on Sep 27 2013, 09:38 PM, said:
MORE! And more fit to read. This is and always has been a racing forum. Some seemed to try to make it their personal vulgar kiddie happy trash talking site. No place for that type of behavior here. Glad the moderator took a stand. 
I asked for an example:
scruffy1a, on Sep 27 2013, 09:53 PM, said:
I think you're talking out your turd hole. What topic is currently being discussed that is more interesting that the discussions occurring last week, and how is it directly related to the difference in membership during that time period?
You didn't give an example:
weluvracin, on Sep 28 2013, 06:03 AM, said:
Who is really the TURD HOLE? It is YOU Scruuuffy! Why always negative comebacks from you with personal attacks on everyone? It really gets old.........get a life! 
I explained that I was looking for an example and you didn't provide one:
scruffy1a, on Sep 28 2013, 09:01 AM, said:
Whoa! All I asked for was an example of what you were claiming. If you can't provide that, then you are talking out your turd hole. Don't make me out to be a bad guy because you are making wild statements.
You reiterated that you thought the board was more interesting, and still did not provide an example:
weluvracin, on Sep 29 2013, 08:50 PM, said:
You Scruuffy asked the question of the folks who visit more frequently - is the board more or less interesting than last week.
Since I am a multiple times per day visitor I thought I might be qualified to reply to your opinion poll. I answered MORE, and also commented that it was good the vulgarity was gone. Now, because I, in my opinion, think it is more interesting, then I am talking out my turd hole. If you were really interested in any opinion other than yours which is always perfect and right, then you would have thanked me for my opinion and started keeping score for other More or Less votes. Instead, you immediately attack me with your turd hole comment. Just goes to show again what everyone already knows about you, that you are an opinionated, perfect in your own mind low life scum bag that truly has nothing better to do that create controversy whenever possible on this board. Why don't you go give yourself a swirly? Maybe it will clear your head up some............ 
I, again, explained that when I said you were talking out your turd hole I meant that you made a claim not supported by evidence:
scruffy1a, on Oct 1 2013, 08:44 AM, said:
Ma'am, the reason I said you were talking out your turd hole is that you could not provide evidence to support your claim that the message board is not more interesting.
You nitpicked that my ORIGINAL post did not ask for examples, but you still did not provide an example:
weluvracin, on Oct 2 2013, 06:53 AM, said:
Again Scruuffy, I invite you to give yourself a swirly and clear your head. I said it was more interesting and not less and your original post did not ask for examples to support our vote on whether we felt the site was more or less interesting. 
I've learned that you make unsupported claims not backed by examples, and get red hot when asked for clarification. This includes insults and rude commentary. Duly noted. This must be frustrating for your husband.
If at first you don't succeed, then maybe you just suck.