Jump to content





Photo

Fastrack world championship


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 theking28b

theking28b

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 41 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 08:31 AM

did they get rained out and whats up with brandon umberger getting suspended for like 15 months?



 

#2 3799

3799

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,870 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 09:40 AM

***IMPORTANT STATEMENT FROM FASTRAK RACING SERIES*** UMBERGER SUSPENDED FROM FASTRAK COMPETITION AFTER THE ACTIONS MADE BY FASTRAK DRIVER BRANDON UMBERGER DURING THE 2013 FASTRAK WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS FEATURE AT BECKLEY MOTORSPORTS PARK IN WEST VIRGINIA. FASTRAK OFFICIALS HAVE ANNOUNCED THE FOLLOWING PENALTIES... DISQUALIFICATION FROM THE ENTIRE 2013 FASTRAK WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS WEEKEND INCLUDING FORFEITURE OF ALL POINTS MONIES AND PURSES FROM RACES. FURTHERMORE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY BRANDON UMBERGER WILL BE SUSPENDED FROM ALL FASTRAK COMPETITION FOR THE REMAINDER OF 2013 AND THEN 365 DAYS BEGINNING JANUARY 1ST 2014!! He came back on the track 15 laps down and deliberately wrecked the leader Chris Meadows.


#3 dobie25fan

dobie25fan

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,065 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Delmont, PA

Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:11 AM

Waiting to see if fastrak changes things again since a super late driver with big funding won the title this year. What a mess with umberger and meadows. Long history of battling on track paid dividends tonight. Gotta nip that shit in the bud, this incident spoiled the soup IMO. But that's crate racin. Great run by Andrew Satterlee with a top 5!

dobie25fansign.jpg

 

http://thedirtnetwork.blogspot.com/

 

 

ROUND ROBIN: "You didn't need my fat sorry carcass to tell you so."

 

 


#4 DownandDirty1

DownandDirty1

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:17 AM

He should banned forever. That was an intentional act of Malice!!!!!


#5 TurnLeft22

TurnLeft22

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 164 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:43 AM

Was Meadows given his spot back or was he not able to continue?


#6 dobie25fan

dobie25fan

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,065 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Delmont, PA

Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:51 AM

Meadows ended up 24 laps down and did not continue.

dobie25fansign.jpg

 

http://thedirtnetwork.blogspot.com/

 

 

ROUND ROBIN: "You didn't need my fat sorry carcass to tell you so."

 

 


#7 3799

3799

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,870 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 02:24 PM

Was Meadows given his spot back or was he not able to continue?

Meadows car was destroyed in the collision.


#8 the punisher

the punisher

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 69 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 02:29 PM

Why didn't they just put max Blair in the lead?


#9 bobvogtjr30

bobvogtjr30

    Member

  • Members
  • 221 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:jtown pa

Posted 06 October 2013 - 03:16 PM

Not the first time someone with big money won. Davenport came in and cleaned house a couple of years ago. They've really lost their way with it being for the low budget teams


#10 DarwinsBeagle

DarwinsBeagle

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 250 posts

Posted 06 October 2013 - 08:18 PM

Not the first time someone with big money won. Davenport came in and cleaned house a couple of years ago. They've really lost their way with it being for the low budget teams


I do not think that Fastrak was designed for the "low budget teams". I think it was designed to be low budget late model racing. Slight but significant difference.

This argument is starting to get tired. This topic shows up in lots of crate late model threads, street stock threads, and most recently, the proposed RUSH 602 modified thread. Everyone seems to be so concerned about who they are racing against rather than just racing.


#11 BaconBits

BaconBits

    Light heavyweight champion of my house

  • Members
  • 4,156 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Mifflin
  • Interests:Medium pimping.

Posted 06 October 2013 - 10:24 PM

Not the first time someone with big money won. Davenport came in and cleaned house a couple of years ago. They've really lost their way with it being for the low budget teams



The only thing FASTRAK ever promised was more affordable engines. If you thought that meant the entire class would/should be for low budget racers, then you are an idiot.

Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

#12 badman21

badman21

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 58 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:16341

Posted 07 October 2013 - 05:49 AM

Why didn't they just put max Blair in the lead?

LOL!!!!!!!!!! :lol:


#13 racer777

racer777

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 311 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:15767

Posted 07 October 2013 - 06:22 AM

I do not think that Fastrak was designed for the "low budget teams". I think it was designed to be low budget late model racing. Slight but significant difference.

This argument is starting to get tired. This topic shows up in lots of crate late model threads, street stock threads, and most recently, the proposed RUSH 602 modified thread. Everyone seems to be so concerned about who they are racing against rather than just racing.


Then stop saying its a feeder class to the big block division or into lates. It is designed to get the lower budget teams started. But the higher funded teams see opportunity to steal easy wins and money so they move down. The problem with fast track is the only real saving cost is on the motor. And that's not even true if you build your own motors. The only sanctioning body that has real creditability is imca. And no tracks around here wanna enforce or have uniform rules with other tracks.no pure/street/pro stock car can travel from one track to the next without changing carb,intake,(entire motor)trans,wheels and tires to be competitive elsewhere. So most are limited to one track. This notion that if all rules are the same we will lose cars is stupid.racers need to be able to run Fri at one track then Saturday elsewhere without changing anything.low budget racers don't have the time and money to change everything and keep two sets of spares for everything just to race. It cost just as much to run a stock car as it does a limited, crate,or open late any more.there needs to be separation for all these classes to work and have higher car counts.


#14 BaconBits

BaconBits

    Light heavyweight champion of my house

  • Members
  • 4,156 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Mifflin
  • Interests:Medium pimping.

Posted 07 October 2013 - 07:11 AM

Then stop saying its a feeder class to the big block division or into lates. It is designed to get the lower budget teams started. But the higher funded teams see opportunity to steal easy wins and money so they move down. The problem with fast track is the only real saving cost is on the motor. And that's not even true if you build your own motors. The only sanctioning body that has real creditability is imca. And no tracks around here wanna enforce or have uniform rules with other tracks.no pure/street/pro stock car can travel from one track to the next without changing carb,intake,(entire motor)trans,wheels and tires to be competitive elsewhere. So most are limited to one track. This notion that if all rules are the same we will lose cars is stupid.racers need to be able to run Fri at one track then Saturday elsewhere without changing anything.low budget racers don't have the time and money to change everything and keep two sets of spares for everything just to race. It cost just as much to run a stock car as it does a limited, crate,or open late any more.there needs to be separation for all these classes to work and have higher car counts.


What to do pure/street/pro stocks have to do with crate late models?


I'll tell you what. NOTHING.

Edited by BaconBits, 07 October 2013 - 07:11 AM.


Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

#15 kip77

kip77

    Member

  • Members
  • 477 posts
  • Location:Clearfield - PA
  • Interests:sports-racing-Hanging out with my daughters Kaelynn and Lana

Posted 07 October 2013 - 10:44 AM

The only thing FASTRAK ever promised was more affordable engines. If you thought that meant the entire class would/should be for low budget racers, then you are an idiot.


Low budget late model racing was exactly what Stan was selling at the very first meeting in Mercer.

Motor racing, mountain climbing and bull fighting are the only true sports... All the rest are children's games played by adults." Ernest Hemingway

Find me on Facebook: Kip Charles - Clearfield, PA
or Twitter @kip1977

#16 racer777

racer777

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 311 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:15767

Posted 07 October 2013 - 10:56 AM

What to do pure/street/pro stocks have to do with crate late models?


I'll tell you what. NOTHING.


The principal.a class these drivers could move into a "cheaper" late car. This is why the class doesn't prosper. Some ppl just don't get the concept.also the reason every track has open" stock "shows.it doesn't even make sense when you say it. luck it, drop everything.everyone run superlate since no class has a budget, hell our government has no spending cap, we might as well not either.


#17 TurnLeft22

TurnLeft22

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 164 posts

Posted 07 October 2013 - 11:39 AM

I love how people get so mad when a guy who has ran super lates drops down to crates. Who are you to say that guy should just spend more money and run supers! This class is exactly what you say a low budget late model class. So if a guy is struggling funding a super late he should not be allowed to run a class he can afford?? Use your head.


#18 theking28b

theking28b

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 41 posts

Posted 07 October 2013 - 02:15 PM

what was the final rundown


#19 fastrakpr

fastrakpr

    Insane Racer

  • Members
  • 1,521 posts

Posted 07 October 2013 - 04:14 PM

Since we are talking about FASTRAK. We set out to do two things. Lower the price of the engines and lower the tire bills from the cost of supers. We have accomplished that. That was what we marketed. Nothing else. If you have suggestions please feel free to email or call me. I am always willing to listen. The only way we can make things better is to listen to each other, understand each others opinions and do our very best to make things better. This is short track racing. Grassroots racing and in my opinion we need to support each other. With the way things are in our economy it doesn't seem to me we can afford to lose anyone. I don't have time to sit on the computer so if you reply here I probably won't see it. Its not that I am ignoring you. Regards; Stan Lester (678) 935-7304 sl@fastrakracing.com


#20 BFP92

BFP92

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 169 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 October 2013 - 04:54 PM

I love how people get so mad when a guy who has ran super lates drops down to crates. Who are you to say that guy should just spend more money and run supers! This class is exactly what you say a low budget late model class. So if a guy is struggling funding a super late he should not be allowed to run a class he can afford?? Use your head.


First of all he's not a guy that dropped down from supers to crate. He runs both classes and most of the time both in the same night and he's definitely not hurting for money because he runs for a fully funded team. Get your facts first before commenting. Time to use your head.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users