Fastrack world championship
#1
Posted 06 October 2013 - 08:31 AM
#2
Posted 06 October 2013 - 09:40 AM
#3
Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:11 AM
http://thedirtnetwork.blogspot.com/
ROUND ROBIN: "You didn't need my fat sorry carcass to tell you so."
#4
Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:17 AM
#5
Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:43 AM
#6
Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:51 AM
http://thedirtnetwork.blogspot.com/
ROUND ROBIN: "You didn't need my fat sorry carcass to tell you so."
#7
Posted 06 October 2013 - 02:24 PM
Meadows car was destroyed in the collision.Was Meadows given his spot back or was he not able to continue?
#8
Posted 06 October 2013 - 02:29 PM
#9
Posted 06 October 2013 - 03:16 PM
#10
Posted 06 October 2013 - 08:18 PM
Not the first time someone with big money won. Davenport came in and cleaned house a couple of years ago. They've really lost their way with it being for the low budget teams
I do not think that Fastrak was designed for the "low budget teams". I think it was designed to be low budget late model racing. Slight but significant difference.
This argument is starting to get tired. This topic shows up in lots of crate late model threads, street stock threads, and most recently, the proposed RUSH 602 modified thread. Everyone seems to be so concerned about who they are racing against rather than just racing.
#11
Posted 06 October 2013 - 10:24 PM
Not the first time someone with big money won. Davenport came in and cleaned house a couple of years ago. They've really lost their way with it being for the low budget teams
The only thing FASTRAK ever promised was more affordable engines. If you thought that meant the entire class would/should be for low budget racers, then you are an idiot.
#12
Posted 07 October 2013 - 05:49 AM
LOL!!!!!!!!!!Why didn't they just put max Blair in the lead?
#13
Posted 07 October 2013 - 06:22 AM
I do not think that Fastrak was designed for the "low budget teams". I think it was designed to be low budget late model racing. Slight but significant difference.
This argument is starting to get tired. This topic shows up in lots of crate late model threads, street stock threads, and most recently, the proposed RUSH 602 modified thread. Everyone seems to be so concerned about who they are racing against rather than just racing.
Then stop saying its a feeder class to the big block division or into lates. It is designed to get the lower budget teams started. But the higher funded teams see opportunity to steal easy wins and money so they move down. The problem with fast track is the only real saving cost is on the motor. And that's not even true if you build your own motors. The only sanctioning body that has real creditability is imca. And no tracks around here wanna enforce or have uniform rules with other tracks.no pure/street/pro stock car can travel from one track to the next without changing carb,intake,(entire motor)trans,wheels and tires to be competitive elsewhere. So most are limited to one track. This notion that if all rules are the same we will lose cars is stupid.racers need to be able to run Fri at one track then Saturday elsewhere without changing anything.low budget racers don't have the time and money to change everything and keep two sets of spares for everything just to race. It cost just as much to run a stock car as it does a limited, crate,or open late any more.there needs to be separation for all these classes to work and have higher car counts.
#14
Posted 07 October 2013 - 07:11 AM
Then stop saying its a feeder class to the big block division or into lates. It is designed to get the lower budget teams started. But the higher funded teams see opportunity to steal easy wins and money so they move down. The problem with fast track is the only real saving cost is on the motor. And that's not even true if you build your own motors. The only sanctioning body that has real creditability is imca. And no tracks around here wanna enforce or have uniform rules with other tracks.no pure/street/pro stock car can travel from one track to the next without changing carb,intake,(entire motor)trans,wheels and tires to be competitive elsewhere. So most are limited to one track. This notion that if all rules are the same we will lose cars is stupid.racers need to be able to run Fri at one track then Saturday elsewhere without changing anything.low budget racers don't have the time and money to change everything and keep two sets of spares for everything just to race. It cost just as much to run a stock car as it does a limited, crate,or open late any more.there needs to be separation for all these classes to work and have higher car counts.
What to do pure/street/pro stocks have to do with crate late models?
I'll tell you what. NOTHING.
Edited by BaconBits, 07 October 2013 - 07:11 AM.
#15
Posted 07 October 2013 - 10:44 AM
The only thing FASTRAK ever promised was more affordable engines. If you thought that meant the entire class would/should be for low budget racers, then you are an idiot.
Low budget late model racing was exactly what Stan was selling at the very first meeting in Mercer.
Find me on Facebook: Kip Charles - Clearfield, PA
or Twitter @kip1977
#16
Posted 07 October 2013 - 10:56 AM
What to do pure/street/pro stocks have to do with crate late models?
I'll tell you what. NOTHING.
The principal.a class these drivers could move into a "cheaper" late car. This is why the class doesn't prosper. Some ppl just don't get the concept.also the reason every track has open" stock "shows.it doesn't even make sense when you say it. luck it, drop everything.everyone run superlate since no class has a budget, hell our government has no spending cap, we might as well not either.
#17
Posted 07 October 2013 - 11:39 AM
#18
Posted 07 October 2013 - 02:15 PM
#19
Posted 07 October 2013 - 04:14 PM
#20
Posted 07 October 2013 - 04:54 PM
I love how people get so mad when a guy who has ran super lates drops down to crates. Who are you to say that guy should just spend more money and run supers! This class is exactly what you say a low budget late model class. So if a guy is struggling funding a super late he should not be allowed to run a class he can afford?? Use your head.
First of all he's not a guy that dropped down from supers to crate. He runs both classes and most of the time both in the same night and he's definitely not hurting for money because he runs for a fully funded team. Get your facts first before commenting. Time to use your head.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users