I cant believe this. Is this going to be good or bad for Lernerville now that the Tompson family is now in FULL control of a major track with no backing of someone who has been in the business for a decade?
Gary Risch Jr no longer associated with lernerville!
#1
Posted 31 August 2016 - 06:49 PM
#2
Posted 31 August 2016 - 06:52 PM
This is what Gary says on Facebook.
I will be staying on with the Tomson family in a consulting role but effective immediately Father Tim Tomson is taking over the General Manager role and will be handling the day to day operations.
#3
Posted 31 August 2016 - 08:16 PM
#4
Posted 31 August 2016 - 09:04 PM
Gary staying on as a consultant, but moving aside as GM/promoter is excellent, IMHO. Gary does some things very well, but he doesn't always listen to the customers/drivers, even when they are right. This gives the Thomsons the flexibility to take Gary's advice or not. It gives Gary the freedom to work with WRG more. It really could be good for everyone.
I'm hopeful.
- WannaRace likes this
My dad drove late models in the early 70's at North Hills, Butler, Mercer, Blanket Hill, and occasionally Tri City. We won the last late model track championship at Blanket Hill.
#5
Posted 01 September 2016 - 08:25 AM
Could this mark the end of the WRG/UMP influence?
Forrest Lucas, Lernerville Speedway on line 1.....
- kinsernut63 likes this
#7
Posted 01 September 2016 - 02:36 PM
#8
Posted 01 September 2016 - 03:13 PM
Bloomer & Co. shutting down WRG, DLM series (well trying )!
#9
Posted 01 September 2016 - 03:20 PM
Lucas Oil Lates would make for a great show at Lernerville
#10
Posted 01 September 2016 - 09:30 PM
You dont know how good the tire rule is for the late models at Lernerville. With the LM tire rule saves money . For the most part you only use one compound the LM 20.
#11
Posted 02 September 2016 - 03:49 AM
#12
Posted 02 September 2016 - 09:28 AM
For Lernerville yes it is great. But no tire rule saves a racer money unless he runs only 1 track. A guy who wants to run multiple tracks each week has to buy certain tires for each track. Then you are talking about extra wheels at $200 each or dismounting and mounting all the time. That keeps a local team confined to one place and keeps car counts down everywhere.You dont know how good the tire rule is for the late models at Lernerville. With the LM tire rule saves money . For the most part you only use one compound the LM 20.
Edited by LM RACING, 02 September 2016 - 09:29 AM.
#13
Posted 02 September 2016 - 09:31 AM
For Lernerville yes it is great. But no tire rule saves a racer money unless he runs only 1 track. A guy who wants to run multiple tracks each week has to buy certain tires for each track. Then you are talking about extra wheels at $200 each or dismounting and mounting all the time. That keeps a local team confined to one place and keeps car counts down everywhere.
The majority of racers are one track racers in 2016. Car counts are down everywhere, regardless of tire rules.
#14
Posted 02 September 2016 - 03:22 PM
LM racing. That is exactly what promotors want. They get a tire deal in place to keep you there. I do agree that it only costs racers if they want to move around. but again, do you think promotors give a crap. NO
#15
Posted 02 September 2016 - 05:20 PM
#16
Posted 03 September 2016 - 11:22 AM
11 or 12 late models some nights at Lernerville. I dont think dropping the tire rule is a bad thing. It needs to go away. Just my thoughts Oh well
#17
Posted 03 September 2016 - 02:06 PM
if we could run 1300's, we would be there more
#18
Posted 03 September 2016 - 10:13 PM
#19
Posted 04 September 2016 - 06:02 AM
#20
Posted 04 September 2016 - 08:08 AM
This is not necessarily a Lernerville-specific response, so keep that in mind.
Again, everyone complains about the expense of lightweight engine components, oppressively expensive/ultra adjustable shocks, data recording & gathering, titanium this, titanium that...but lobbies for the the exact track conditions that these components are favorable and designed for.
I don't get it. Isn't racing about going fast? If you want to reduce costs, doesn't it make sense to reduce the need for the toothpick tie rod ends, tin foil spindles, lightweight (read: expensive) rotational components, hyper sensitive shocks, etc.?
Keeping the water truck maintained also helps with the dust, which better attracts the new fan, the casual fan and the wife/gf of the hardcore fan. You know...the exact group of people who EVERY track owner wants to attract and who push a losing or breakeven night into a profitable night.
If we all want dirt track racing to exist for generations to come, the worst thing that can happen is to let the inmates run the asylum. Though we like to put racers on pedestals, they are rarely looking past the "ends of their hoods". They looking out for themselves and what affects them immediately, not the overall and long-term health of dirt track racing.
Hell, the most fun I ever had as a driver was on tacky surfaces.
Fire away with your insults and name calling. However, I know what keeps my wife and I away more and more. I go to fewer and fewer races every year. At this point, I don't ever care if I am not at a dirt track every single Friday and Saturday night anymore. If it keeps the most hardcore fans away after 4 1/2 decades of being at a dirt track in some capacity, I assure you that it keeps away people with lesser interest than us.
- baldtireman, Lernerville PR BigE, RACERSPASTOR and 2 others like this
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users