Jump to content





Photo

Gary Risch Jr no longer associated with lernerville!

Removed himself from GM

  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 MeXican_BOB

MeXican_BOB

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 297 posts
  • Location:Cadiz, Ohio
  • Interests:Racing

Posted 31 August 2016 - 06:49 PM

I cant believe this. Is this going to be good or bad for Lernerville now that the Tompson family is now in FULL control of a major track with no backing of someone who has been in the business for a decade? 





 

#2 animalgfx

animalgfx

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,314 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Curwensville, PA
  • Interests:My 3 boys, Racing, Fishing.

Posted 31 August 2016 - 06:52 PM

This is what Gary says on Facebook.

I will be staying on with the Tomson family in a consulting role but effective immediately Father Tim Tomson is taking over the General Manager role and will be handling the day to day operations.



Animal Graphics & Signs

#3 jo73

jo73

    No Life

  • Members
  • 2,187 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh
  • Interests:Life, Dirt racing, H-D, Golf, Corvettes, Street Rods.

Posted 31 August 2016 - 08:16 PM

Interesting to say the least. It will be something to watch if changes are coming. I don't have a clue as to why this would happen so late in the year. Or, this was a decision made sometime ago and it is just being released because the Tomson's had all intentions to take over the day by day operations.


#4 FanJim24

FanJim24

    Race Fan

  • Members
  • 858 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 August 2016 - 09:04 PM

Gary staying on as a consultant, but moving aside as GM/promoter is excellent, IMHO.  Gary does some things very well, but he doesn't always listen to the customers/drivers, even when they are right.  This gives the Thomsons the flexibility to take Gary's advice or not.  It gives Gary the freedom to work with WRG more.  It really could be good for everyone.  

 

I'm hopeful.  



My dad drove late models in the early 70's at North Hills, Butler, Mercer, Blanket Hill, and occasionally Tri City. We won the last late model track championship at Blanket Hill. 


#5 D1RT

D1RT

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,212 posts

Posted 01 September 2016 - 08:25 AM

Could this mark the end of the WRG/UMP influence?

Forrest Lucas, Lernerville Speedway on line 1..... ;)




#6 blue by you

blue by you

    Insane Racer

  • Members
  • 1,025 posts

Posted 01 September 2016 - 01:40 PM

it's a shame this didn't happen before the rush deal was cooked up to screw the sportsman racers.




#7 Benny K

Benny K

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,578 posts

Posted 01 September 2016 - 02:36 PM

Well all that doom and gloom came and the car count was a few cars lower than years past. I would like to see them drop the tire rule for Late Models, but hope they keep the big WoO sanctioned events.


#8 BUTTBEAK

BUTTBEAK

    RAPIDIUSRIDICULOSIS's

  • Members
  • 1,554 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Painting Landscapes

Posted 01 September 2016 - 03:13 PM

Bloomer & Co. shutting down WRG, DLM series (well trying  :unsure: )! 




#9 kinsernut63

kinsernut63

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Butler, Pa
  • Interests:anything dirt or nitro

Posted 01 September 2016 - 03:20 PM

Lucas Oil Lates  would make for a great show at Lernerville



nitro

#10 The Sheriff

The Sheriff

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 01 September 2016 - 09:30 PM

You dont know how good the tire rule is for the late models at Lernerville.  With the LM tire rule saves money . For the most part you only use one compound the LM 20. 




#11 Toolbox3

Toolbox3

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 218 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 September 2016 - 03:49 AM

Just have a 1 or 2 compounds but take the dam restriction off only having their tire. Same cost or cheaper but then the track looses their tire deal MONEY!!!!!!!


#12 LM RACING

LM RACING

    Race Fan

  • Members
  • 764 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Mifflin

Posted 02 September 2016 - 09:28 AM

You dont know how good the tire rule is for the late models at Lernerville.  With the LM tire rule saves money . For the most part you only use one compound the LM 20. 

For Lernerville yes it is great. But no tire rule saves a racer money unless he runs only 1 track. A guy who wants to run multiple tracks each week has to buy certain tires for each track. Then you are talking about extra wheels at $200 each or dismounting and mounting all the time. That keeps a local team confined to one place and keeps car counts down everywhere.

Edited by LM RACING, 02 September 2016 - 09:29 AM.


Matt D

#13 BaconBits

BaconBits

    Light heavyweight champion of my house

  • Members
  • 4,156 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Mifflin
  • Interests:Medium pimping.

Posted 02 September 2016 - 09:31 AM

For Lernerville yes it is great. But no tire rule saves a racer money unless he runs only 1 track. A guy who wants to run multiple tracks each week has to buy certain tires for each track. Then you are talking about extra wheels at $200 each or dismounting and mounting all the time. That keeps a local team confined to one place and keeps car counts down everywhere.

 


The majority of racers are one track racers in 2016. Car counts are down everywhere, regardless of tire rules.



Follow me on Twitter: @JoshBayko

#14 jo73

jo73

    No Life

  • Members
  • 2,187 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh
  • Interests:Life, Dirt racing, H-D, Golf, Corvettes, Street Rods.

Posted 02 September 2016 - 03:22 PM

LM racing. That is exactly what promotors want. They get a tire deal in place to keep you there. I do agree that it only costs racers if they want to move around. but again, do you think promotors give a crap. NO




#15 714d

714d

    Race Fan

  • Members
  • 739 posts

Posted 02 September 2016 - 05:20 PM

Lernerville is about the only track in this region that can successfully run their own tire. They get a full field weekly. Those guys buy the tires they need to run there, and the teams that are running multiple races every week have the funding to buy the tires necessary to do so. They are going to buy tires no matter where they go, so it really doesn't matter what type. Every other track in the region has to depend on pulling some different cars from different tracks each week to even dream of having a full field. In that case, the track can't afford to make rules to keep outsiders away.


#16 lepsch1

lepsch1

    Cool Newbie

  • Members
  • 47 posts

Posted 03 September 2016 - 11:22 AM

11 or 12 late models some nights at Lernerville.  I dont think dropping the tire rule is a bad thing.  It needs to go away. Just my thoughts  Oh well




#17 94.3-RADRACER

94.3-RADRACER

    Member

  • Members
  • 6,661 posts
  • Interests:hunting,fishing,racing

Posted 03 September 2016 - 02:06 PM

if we could run 1300's, we would be there more




#18 tdietz10

tdietz10

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 379 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:saxonburg
  • Interests:Racing

Posted 03 September 2016 - 10:13 PM

Dropping the tire rule a bad thing, you'll get a few cars here and there but the competition is what keeps the cars from coming. If they lose the tire rule I'll have to buy 3 different compounds to race a night and it will cost more it sucks the tires cost more then a regualr one but that's the way it is, if they want to gain cars they should park the water truck the track has been way to fast this year.


#19 Crusty1

Crusty1

    Race Fan

  • Members
  • 930 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A Race Track Near You

Posted 04 September 2016 - 06:02 AM

I agree put the water truck away! It's hard on equipment and it takes away the need for talent,everyone is fast and can drive when the car is locked down to the track.


#20 DarwinsBeagle

DarwinsBeagle

    Fast Newbie

  • Members
  • 250 posts

Posted 04 September 2016 - 08:08 AM

This is not necessarily a Lernerville-specific response, so keep that in mind.

 

Again, everyone complains about the expense of lightweight engine components, oppressively expensive/ultra adjustable shocks, data recording & gathering, titanium this, titanium that...but lobbies for the the exact track conditions that these components are favorable and designed for.

 

I don't get it.  Isn't racing about going fast?  If you want to reduce costs, doesn't it make sense to reduce the need for the toothpick tie rod ends, tin foil spindles, lightweight (read: expensive) rotational components, hyper sensitive shocks, etc.?

 

Keeping the water truck maintained also helps with the dust, which better attracts the new fan, the casual fan and the wife/gf of the hardcore fan.  You know...the exact group of people who EVERY track owner wants to attract and who push a losing or breakeven night into a profitable night.

 

If we all want dirt track racing to exist for generations to come, the worst thing that can happen is to let the inmates run the asylum.  Though we like to put racers on pedestals, they are rarely looking past the "ends of their hoods".  They looking out for themselves and what affects them immediately, not the overall and long-term health of dirt track racing.

 

Hell, the most fun I ever had as a driver was on tacky surfaces.

 

Fire away with your insults and name calling.  However, I know what keeps my wife and I away more and more.  I go to fewer and fewer races every year.  At this point, I don't ever care if I am not at a dirt track every single Friday and Saturday night anymore.  If it keeps the most hardcore fans away after 4 1/2 decades of being at a dirt track in some capacity, I assure you that it keeps away people with lesser interest than us.







2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users