Richard Childress has money because he EARNED it!!!! Came from a street stock type class to NASCAR and made his own way. One of the few car
owners in NASCAR today that has made the sport his life, rather than a playground for spending money they made somewhere else!! One of the
few "old school" guys left!! Larson may well be the better "natural" driver, but I think Dillon has a better shot at the NASCAR Rookie of the Year
award due to the Childress team being much more consistent than the guys behind the # 42. It is going to be a good year long battle and I will enjoy
watching it!! GOOD LUCK TO BOTH!!!
Walt

Austin Dillon
Started by snooky, Feb 23 2014 11:12 PM
23 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 01 March 2014 - 10:49 AM
#22
Posted 01 March 2014 - 11:12 AM
Drivers track this weekend. Phoenix.
Larson starts 8th Dillion 24th.
#23
Posted 01 March 2014 - 11:50 AM
these two guys are both great drivers. I don't believe either of them will disappoint come the end of the season. they can both wheel a car pretty much no matter what it is. Dillon has better backing, sure, but who in their right mind would turn down that opportunity haha
#24
Posted 01 March 2014 - 06:32 PM
Kyle Larson made his way from nothing like Richard Childress ( that they both didn't have much ) The money is there at Ganassi .. I believe they couldn't stand the Brazilian one bit !I listened on a scanner most of the race in October at Martinsville to Juan and you could tell they couldn't stand him and were just riding till the end !the Dillons are to me like Jr .. all money and some talent . RCR will put Dillon up there to just fade back and Larson is the next jeff Gordon or Jimmy Johnson.these two guys are both great drivers. I don't believe either of them will disappoint come the end of the season. they can both wheel a car pretty much no matter what it is. Dillon has better backing, sure, but who in their right mind would turn down that opportunity haha
Edited by DavyLee2, 01 March 2014 - 06:33 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users