Knox results
#21
Posted 13 August 2012 - 12:36 PM
#22
Posted 13 August 2012 - 12:47 PM
Thank you. Now I see why Sportsmans doesn't give the results. They are afraid French will see them. But if he has spies out there, he would find out anyhow. So please tell Sportsmans they can release the results now. No need to keep them a secret any longer. French knows and so should we.I bet the car was completely 100% legal according to the rules that sealed OSW AND Racesaver engines are legal. However if Skip was running his Racesaver engine he would have run aground of French Grimes for racing at a nonsanctioned 305 race with one of French's cars, for which he would be punished severely and monetarily punished had word gotten back to Mr Grimes.
The thing is you can bet one of French's spies has no doubt already informed him of the dilema. He sends them out to all 305 races looking for teams to suspend and fine.
#23
Posted 13 August 2012 - 12:55 PM
#24
Posted 13 August 2012 - 01:31 PM
Why should they HAVE to post the results on this site? Personally dont blame them seeings how not many people have good things to say about any track on here just voice the bads..If you would look at their website they post the results just usually may take a few days..Thank you. Now I see why Sportsmans doesn't give the results. They are afraid French will see them. But if he has spies out there, he would find out anyhow. So please tell Sportsmans they can release the results now. No need to keep them a secret any longer. French knows and so should we.
#25
Posted 13 August 2012 - 01:47 PM
Why should they HAVE to post the results on this site? Personally dont blame them seeings how not many people have good things to say about any track on here just voice the bads..If you would look at their website they post the results just usually may take a few days..
If you are looking to attract some new fans the ease at which they can obtain the results would be beneficial.(Marketing 101) And since most fans from Western and North Central PA and Eastern OH visit this site it would definitely make your results available to the majority of fans who are likely to attend the track.
#26
Posted 13 August 2012 - 01:53 PM
Then if he was worried about that, don't come race there as the results are posted on this site and many others. He has raced Mercer and they post results on several web sites. So your barking up the wrong tree. Make a choice then. If people are afraid of French Grimes do as they did out west, drop him like a bad habit. Do as Mercer, Sportsman, Fremont, Attica and Wayne County are doing. Racing with a rules package. Some with 5.3L and 305 and some with just 305, but independent of RaceSaver. And I am not bashing R.S. as it is a good program on paper. But political from there on.I bet the car was completely 100% legal according to the rules that sealed OSW AND Racesaver engines are legal. However if Skip was running his Racesaver engine he would have run aground of French Grimes for racing at a nonsanctioned 305 race with one of French's cars, for which he would be punished severely and monetarily punished had word gotten back to Mr Grimes.
The thing is you can bet one of French's spies has no doubt already informed him of the dilema. He sends them out to all 305 races looking for teams to suspend and fine.
And this was not about R.S. is was about the refusal to be Teched. And then being allowed to race.
Paul Whitesell
Edited by Dad#17, 13 August 2012 - 01:59 PM.
#27
Posted 13 August 2012 - 02:22 PM
Paul I am not defending Racesaver or Skip. He has a couple different engines. Why he was not immediately disqualified I do not know. I also do not know why he cannot still be disqualified. I am the first one to say you don't need French Grimes to have a successful limited sprint racing. What you need are rules like OSW has and enforce them.Then if he was worried about that, don't come race there as the results are posted on this site and many others. He has raced Mercer and they post results on several web sites. So your barking up the wrong tree. Make a choice then. If people are afraid of French Grimes do as they did out west, drop him like a bad habit. Do as Mercer, Sportsman, Fremont, Attica and Wayne County are doing. Racing with a rules package. Some with 5.3L and 305 and some with just 305, but independent of RaceSaver. And I am not bashing R.S. as it is a good program on paper. But political from there on.
And this was not about R.S. is was about the refusal to be Teched. And then being allowed to race.
Paul Whitesell
Mike Dutko
Edited by 3799, 13 August 2012 - 03:08 PM.
#28
Posted 13 August 2012 - 03:41 PM
Paul I am not defending Racesaver or Skip. He has a couple different engines. Why he was not immediately disqualified I do not know. I also do not know why he cannot still be disqualified. I am the first one to say you don't need French Grimes to have a successful limited sprint racing. What you need are rules like OSW has and enforce them.
Mike Dutko
Mike,
He can have several engines. That is his choice. And I would agree with the French Grimes issue. But no matter what engine he had in his car, he refused to tech. That is the issue. And let me be clear, I am not, have not and will not call Skip a cheater. Because that would be pure assumption on anyones part. And I will not let this turn into calling him a cheater and I will still defend him because no one but Skip knows that answer. And I agree, as with any track, denying tech is cause for disqualification for that event or possible other events. If that is how the rules of that class are written. And I agree with the OSW rules being a very solid foundation. Several smart people put them together for the sport of racing and this class. Perfect, nothing is ...I am not the judge, jury and executioner of this act, the class as a whole is.
Paul Whitesell
#29
Posted 13 August 2012 - 03:52 PM
#30
Posted 13 August 2012 - 06:43 PM
#31
Posted 13 August 2012 - 08:16 PM
#32
Posted 13 August 2012 - 08:38 PM
#33
Posted 13 August 2012 - 08:44 PM
Mike,
He can have several engines. That is his choice. And I would agree with the French Grimes issue. But no matter what engine he had in his car, he refused to tech. That is the issue. And let me be clear, I am not, have not and will not call Skip a cheater. Because that would be pure assumption on anyones part. And I will not let this turn into calling him a cheater and I will still defend him because no one but Skip knows that answer. And I agree, as with any track, denying tech is cause for disqualification for that event or possible other events. If that is how the rules of that class are written. And I agree with the OSW rules being a very solid foundation. Several smart people put them together for the sport of racing and this class. Perfect, nothing is ...I am not the judge, jury and executioner of this act, the class as a whole is.
Paul Whitesell
Paul,
We agree 100%. The excuse that the tech guy was an imposter does not hold water. I will not comment on how Sportsmans runs their show. I will say that anyone who questions whether or not We tech at Mercer is a fool if they think we do not. The OSW rules state a car can be inspected if there is a suspicion of wrong doing. Should Skip race at Mercer it is my belief and only my belief, not the track that he should have to submit to an inspection before he is allowed to race. The whole thing baffles me Skip was one of the biggest supporters of rules and their enforcement. I like yourself do not believe he can be branded a cheater, but he should not be looked upon as the winner of the race either.
Mike Dutko
#34
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:10 PM
Website - http://pavdma.wix.co...tage-modifieds#
#35
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:28 PM
Walt Tutak inspected several cars Sunday. You were the only one to refuse. Walt is the reason OSW and Racesaver are even racing at Sportsmans. Don't try to make it look like he is some shady character because French Grimes took him off the Racesaver Board. All he did was try to come up with an agreement with Mercer to allow Racesaver sprints to race at more tracks than Dog Hollow. Something you supported by the way. Sportsmans Speedway is now on record that OSW can deal as they wish with this and any other incidents and they will not change any decisions made.The reason is simple, the self appointed tech man at sportsman speedway is not affiliated with racesaver, OSW, or sportsman speedway. In fact he was removed from the Western pa.racesaver board for his antics. I am sure if when mercer decides to tech it will be by the proper officials and not one of the participants that decide that night to be the tech inspector! There is a proper way to do things and having racers tech other racers isn't the right way.I will be more than happy to have my car teched by an official from Racesaver or OSW.but not by one of my competitors at any time.sorry but I was already down that road and it just isn't fair. So get a proper official and tech away, other than that leave me alone! Skip.
#36
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:34 PM
#37
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:36 PM
#38
Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:52 PM
#39
Posted 13 August 2012 - 10:04 PM
#40
Posted 13 August 2012 - 10:31 PM
seems to be the million dollar question....Like I have said I believe your car was 100% legal so why not let it be inspected?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users