Payout for Lernerville
#41
Posted 22 August 2017 - 04:20 PM
#42
Posted 22 August 2017 - 04:28 PM
#43
Posted 22 August 2017 - 05:53 PM
#44
Posted 22 August 2017 - 08:42 PM
ump keeps us away........tracks to heavy also........and those rush sprints will knock 410's around..........once they see what they run for in rush, and they grow, hotrod98's big talk will be in one......
#45
Posted 22 August 2017 - 10:07 PM
no chance. Don't have a stake in the game. Sorryump keeps us away........tracks to heavy also........and those rush sprints will knock 410's around..........once they see what they run for in rush, and they grow, hotrod98's big talk will be in one......
Edited by Hotrod98, 22 August 2017 - 10:08 PM.
#46
Posted 23 August 2017 - 09:36 AM
It's not just Lernerville.
Generally speaking, racing in western PA has taken an overall decline over the past 5 years, at least from my perspective. The excitement of attending weekly racing has worn off and it has nothing to do with the facility or the track or the food or the camping or the prices. The quality of the racing just isn't what it used to be. No one goes to watch a train race, follow the leader type of event. Sadly though, that's what it's been the last handful of times that I've attended. I remember coming home and having something to talk about, a battle for the lead, the driver who came from 16th up to 3rd, the three car battle for 4th place, etc.
I blame it on the fact that the sport has gotten too expensive and the level of competition just isn't what it was. The talent/budget gap between first and last places has become too extreme. This is only amplified by the lower car counts. We're then left to watch some boring racing. Blame it on the economy, blame it on the purses, blame it on whatever you choose, unless a miracle happens, it's only going to be a bumpier road from here. There's always talk about how the younger generation isn't interested. Why would they be? Races with no passing, being dominated by only a few drivers. Doesn't sound too appealing to me either.
Sadly, I can't offer any solution. One could get into the debate on crate cars and spec cars and rules packages and blah blah blah, but that's been beaten to death. The guys with the big check books are just going to spend spend spend at whatever cost it takes, leaving the smaller budget teams in their dust. The smaller budget teams are what makes local weekly racing work though, and they're quickly closing up shop. Can you blame them?
- ramorganti, Chad's Dad and Wolfie29 like this
#47
Posted 23 August 2017 - 10:25 AM
It's tough watching things you loved as a youth disappear. Horse racing is on life support. Who remembers watching PBA bowling in the winter at 3pm on ABC when it was a big deal. It's funny to look back when it was a bigger prize fund than golf.
I don't have an answer either. It's a bad trend of less gate means less prize fund which means less cars and even less gate.
- Wolfie29 likes this
#48
Posted 23 August 2017 - 10:39 AM
Edited by Wolfie29, 23 August 2017 - 10:44 AM.
#49
Posted 23 August 2017 - 10:49 AM
54Warrior you are so 1000% correct. Even at 47 I still love to read the stories before I started to go to races. (Late starter in my early 20's) of how it used to be. Track and racers Thursday thru Sunday. I'm sure everybody tried to one up each other but it was a few $$$ spent and not thousands. Everybody racing is older. There is no new generation because cost of entry for anything besides a 4 banger is not realistic for the average person.
It's tough watching things you loved as a youth disappear. Horse racing is on life support. Who remembers watching PBA bowling in the winter at 3pm on ABC when it was a big deal. It's funny to look back when it was a bigger prize fund than golf.
I don't have an answer either. It's a bad trend of less gate means less prize fund which means less cars and even less gate.
Sure there's no passing there ain't nobody to pass anymore.
You can't have any passing if you don't have cars to pass. Reducing car count from 24 to 20 hurt potential payout to lesser cars which are needed to have something to pass. Mandatory make money for promoters items further hurt having less then top dollar shiny cars at the race. Then there's take lapped cars out of their earned place in line, put them to the back and do away with any advantage the front runners earned keeping fans from seeing passing.
Sure there's no passing there ain't nobody to pass anymore.
Sure wish fans would make up their minds do they want to see car count and passing or do they want to see a few shiny high dollar cars play follow the leader? Since 2000 local promoters have done all they can to push away lower budget racers who are part of the show.
#50
Posted 23 August 2017 - 11:54 AM
#51
Posted 23 August 2017 - 12:40 PM
"you cannot afford to have a back marker do something stupid" I'm not arguing the point you made I'm expanding on it.
Back markers can afford even less to have a front runner come around and do something stupid.
Back markers can afford even less to have a stupid front runner put to the back do something stupid.
Back markers can afford even less front runners racing for the checkers doing something stupid.
Stupid in racing isn't a low budget only club locking it's doors to top ten racers.
Low budget back markers get their top tens and occasionally better because high budget front runners can be just as stupid.
edit: You cannot afford to have a track if there ain't cars there to race and that's the bottom line those who bleed money out of racers don't understand. Fans don't come through the gate to eat popcorn they come to see the show, degrade the show front runner or back marker and you ain't got no fans.
Quoting a local promoter: "I charge racers a fair price to race at the quality track I provide". It's that line of thinking not poor back markers that has hurt local racing. Racers front runner or back marker are not just customers, they are the show.
Edited by dirtstudent2, 23 August 2017 - 12:57 PM.
#52
Posted 23 August 2017 - 01:05 PM
#53
Posted 23 August 2017 - 01:10 PM
DS2. I thought for sure you would have tossed 10G into the mix.
What is 10G ten grand?
edit: jo73, DS2 (ds squared) is theory in physics which may make it possible to go beyond the speed of light and additional theory presented on here and generally not believed by readers, which may make it possible for back markers to go beyond the speed of front runners. Both are tough to put into application.
Edited by dirtstudent2, 23 August 2017 - 01:22 PM.
#54
Posted 23 August 2017 - 01:15 PM
one way to fix it is the purse. Go out east.... The Grove, Lincoln, Port, all pay over 3000 to win WEEKLY. Have large car counts with great cars, and good racing, and big crowds. Western PA is slowly dying out. And it's going to take one track to increase the purse, maybe step away from 1 tire distributor, and I am will to bet cars come back, the quality of cars come back, and better racing comes back. That seems to be the biggest complaint. More locals running elsewhere or specials that pay more because of the purse. If only one track had the balls to step up and increase the purse, alot would change for the better. And I am not saying to jump to Eastern PA tracks right off the bat. But make it worth it, and cars will show.It's not just Lernerville.
Generally speaking, racing in western PA has taken an overall decline over the past 5 years, at least from my perspective. The excitement of attending weekly racing has worn off and it has nothing to do with the facility or the track or the food or the camping or the prices. The quality of the racing just isn't what it used to be. No one goes to watch a train race, follow the leader type of event. Sadly though, that's what it's been the last handful of times that I've attended. I remember coming home and having something to talk about, a battle for the lead, the driver who came from 16th up to 3rd, the three car battle for 4th place, etc.
I blame it on the fact that the sport has gotten too expensive and the level of competition just isn't what it was. The talent/budget gap between first and last places has become too extreme. This is only amplified by the lower car counts. We're then left to watch some boring racing. Blame it on the economy, blame it on the purses, blame it on whatever you choose, unless a miracle happens, it's only going to be a bumpier road from here. There's always talk about how the younger generation isn't interested. Why would they be? Races with no passing, being dominated by only a few drivers. Doesn't sound too appealing to me either.
Sadly, I can't offer any solution. One could get into the debate on crate cars and spec cars and rules packages and blah blah blah, but that's been beaten to death. The guys with the big check books are just going to spend spend spend at whatever cost it takes, leaving the smaller budget teams in their dust. The smaller budget teams are what makes local weekly racing work though, and they're quickly closing up shop. Can you blame them?
#55
Posted 23 August 2017 - 01:54 PM
Edited by sicario, 23 August 2017 - 02:17 PM.
- LM D42 likes this
#56
Posted 23 August 2017 - 02:17 PM
Seriously, I don't know this one, but I wouldn't be surprised if Don Martin was the last promoter at Lernerville to raise the purse. If it wasn't him it was the Roenicks. It's been that long.
My dad drove late models in the early 70's at North Hills, Butler, Mercer, Blanket Hill, and occasionally Tri City. We won the last late model track championship at Blanket Hill.
#57
Posted 23 August 2017 - 02:44 PM
Because watching Mike Pegher, Max Blair, and Russ King dominate crates with brand new Xr1's against a bunch of people that are 'low buck' is enjoyable? At least the supers go fast. I take piss breaks during the crate races and come back 1 lap later.
Yup, the hundreds of people in the stands will quit going if they don't get to see Mike Norris win 9 out of 10 combined heats and features over 8 cars every week, versus watching 24-28 weekly Crate late models instead.
- whiteboy55 likes this
#58
Posted 23 August 2017 - 02:48 PM
I got denied the use of a rain check. Was told they don't honor rain checks. The guy next to me forgot to bring his, and asked if he could bring it next week and was told the same thing, No rain checks. I call bullshit. I call greed.
After missing 3 weeks to rain the pop goes up to $2.50. They got my last dollar Friday night. Down down down they go.
Dont worry. They are giving a big $50 to all drivers this week! I wonder if that's why the admission had gone up?
#59
Posted 23 August 2017 - 02:51 PM
one way to fix it is the purse. Go out east.... The Grove, Lincoln, Port, all pay over 3000 to win WEEKLY. Have large car counts with great cars, and good racing, and big crowds. Western PA is slowly dying out. And it's going to take one track to increase the purse, maybe step away from 1 tire distributor, and I am will to bet cars come back, the quality of cars come back, and better racing comes back. That seems to be the biggest complaint. More locals running elsewhere or specials that pay more because of the purse. If only one track had the balls to step up and increase the purse, alot would change for the better. And I am not saying to jump to Eastern PA tracks right off the bat. But make it worth it, and cars will show.
I think your mistaken they don't always get full fields out east. Lincoln and Port Royal go head to head on Saturday splitting cars and the Grove usually runs on Fridays to avoid splitting cars more. What keeps out east going is the same as what keeps California racing going. The two areas are within driving distance of most of the population of the United States. What fans around here see is the crowds they experience when they go out east for a special show. Sure they have a lot of seats reserved out east but on a regular night you can sit most any place you like in the stands.
I think the last changes in purse payout at Lernerville and Mercer was a lowering of it.
Does anyone really think the tracks around here care about having full fields? All they see is if there's not a full field then they don't have to payout as much. They learned the lesson well when going from putting 24 cars on the track to 20.
Edited by dirtstudent2, 23 August 2017 - 03:08 PM.
#60
Posted 23 August 2017 - 02:53 PM
ump keeps us away........tracks to heavy also........and those rush sprints will knock 410's around..........once they see what they run for in rush, and they grow, hotrod98's big talk will be in one......
RUSH Sprints pushing the 410s out? LOL
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users